http://www.jinxiboo.com/blog/tag/risks
I am writing to you after reading your exit cards, talking to a lot of you personally and talking to your last professor Dr. Savage. As well, I like to share my metacognition for what I am doing and why. The image here suggests what I would like for you to experience (A bit!). Here I will address several key issues that have arisen.
I am writing to you after reading your exit cards, talking to a lot of you personally and talking to your last professor Dr. Savage. As well, I like to share my metacognition for what I am doing and why. The image here suggests what I would like for you to experience (A bit!). Here I will address several key issues that have arisen.
Culture of Learning. The new story of classroom
assessment is about creating a classroom for learning. That is students learn
because they want to learn and not because they will be graded for their work. The strategies for this approach are AfL (assessment
for learning) and AaL (assessment as Learning). AfL provides feedback for
students to know how to improve their work and what the next step is. This means that the student must receive
feedback in some form. As well the teacher receives feedback that informs
her/him how to shift the teaching to reach more students. This feedback is
gathered by strategies such as observation, tests, conversations and exit
cards. Your exit cards provided me with a lot of information for my next steps.
In this classroom it is
difficult to establish a culture of learning, as it is clear that you are all
used to a culture for grading. The problem with a culture of grading is that
you are learning for an external reward – usually pleasing the teacher or a
grade on a paper. But this is short term learning and usually forgotten
quickly.
In a CULTURE FOR
LEARNING we want students to engage in
deep learning. They learn about a topic in depth exploring it from many points
of view. One of the features of a culture for learning is that there are no grades. Students do not constantly
need to worry about how they might lose a mark or gain one. Instead they can
pay attention to the feedback that they get for their work and improve based on
this feedback.
Jigsaw. The jigsaw activity was more or less successful in
different groups. If you were in a successful expert group you learned a lot about
one literacy and if you were in a successful sharing group you learned some things
about the different literacies – enough to know how to explore more deeply if
you wish to and to think about what these literacies may mean in your practice.
As well you were involved enough in the group discussions that you could write
an informed paper for the midterm. Jigsaw is a strategy used in schools and is generally enjoyed by students. It
means that each student will know a lot about one aspect of a topic and enough
about other sides of the issue to have general sense of whole.How might you sue it in PJ classes?
A successful jigsaw requires
collaboration to be successful. Collaboration is a 21st Century
skill. It depends on each person
participating fully while in his or her expert group. It requires that each
person fully shares the learning from the expert groups. To do less means that
the others in the group who are learning from you are at a disadvantage when it
comes to knowing about literacies. Do you think PJ students are too young to learn this? Or might it be easier to learn the responsibilities involved in collaboration by learning the skill early?
Culture of learning and the jigsaw/curriculum
When we asked why some groups
were done so quickly with their sharing activity, we were told by several
people that because the presentation wasn’t being marked, it wasn’t being taken
seriously. We were a bit surprised and disappointed that not all groups took
this activity seriously (For those that did, bravo!). There is not much we can do about that now
but we hope that for the rest of the course you will be aware of how your decision
on your level of participation affects the others you are working with and ask
that each of you pulls your own weight.
This will be particularly important in the curriculum building groups.
Meanwhile I wonder how you
will build a culture of learning in your PJ classroom. How will you deal with
grades? How will you encourage intrinsic motivation for your young learners?
On course organization
I understand your confusion
around course expectations. This is my opportunity to clarify and adjust course
expectations according to comments on the exit cards. I totally understand your desire for a good
grade and the importance of this. How can I deal with the anxiety around grades
and my hope that you will embrace the challenge of trying new things and being
creative? How can I create a relaxing environment where you are willing to be
innovative and let go of the need to know exactly how to get the grade? In class I would like to “negotiate” with you
so that we can balance your needs with my hope for you.
Blogging:
Your 4 blogs are worth 20%. This means
that your blogs should be substantive with lots of links, images, even YouTubes. Some of yours this week DID fit these
criteria. But some blogs missed the
mark. A paragraph is not enough. We want
DEPTH and that takes more than a paragraph. One way to rectify this is to use
your blog in a more ongoing way as a learning log. Here you could record
thoughts and ahas! as you go along. Some of you are already doing that as the
syllabus says you can continue writing and add thoughts and reflections in
addition to the required 4 blog posts.
Connecting to your online teacher
blogs is a good thing to think about. Are they teaching 21st Century
skills? New literacies? Integrated curriculum? You can also collect relevant pieces from the Internet
and use your blog to demonstrate the 21st Century skill of curation.
Think of an art curator or museum curator.
You are a curator of 21St Century skills on the Internet
using your blog.
The blog checkbrick is here
and in the Syllabus:
Criteria
|
Comments
|
Uses “I” rather than third
person
|
|
Integrates personal
experiences with other resources and course material.
|
|
Demonstrates critical
thinking
|
|
Reflects upon connections
to uncover new insights
|
|
Deals with significant
issues or concerns
|
|
Demonstrates insights, and
understands the appreciation of issue complexity. Considers various
perspectives and viewpoints
|
|
Uses language conventions
properly. Blog is well organized, coherent and is reader-friendly
|
|
Shows evidence of awareness
of branding. Professionally appealing. Addition of relevant images,
hyperlinks and YouTubes.
|
|
Reference list if necessary
|
RPAT
After some thought and seeing
your confusion, I realize that the best way to do this is to give you a choice of
using a 5th blog for the RPAT. You may also use any other technology
you wish. Conventional choices would be powerpoint or prezi. If you wish to use something like Glogster or
Pinterest etc. for the task of curation, you can link this to the blog. Here is an example of curation at Prof Susan Drake's paper. Note this is an automatic curation - I did not do the work to choose relevant pieces. You will also need a way to narrate your curation as your task is to:
As a budding educator/researcher in the 21st
century one of the most important questions you need to ask yourself is: How
will I incorporate the 21st century literacies into my own practice?
In order to help you answer this key question you will be engaging in a number
of activities throughout the term. You will also be required to find and follow online
a minimum of three interesting educators
who regularly contribute online through a blog throughout the entire term. At least TWO of the educators must
teach in the primary/junior panel. You are free to follow as many educators as
you like. There is no maximum number. Everyone should follow Aviva Dunsiger.
Her blog is Avivaloca at http://adunsiger.com/.
Her twitter handle is @avivaloca. Other suggestions are Cathy Cassidy at http://mscassidysclass.edublogs.org/.
Her Twitter handle is @misscathyclass. Ms Wideen’s classroom blog is at http://mrswideensclass.blogspot.ca.
Her personal blog is http://mrswideen.blogspot.ca.
At the end of the term you will create a public online
product that answers the key question: How will I incorporate the 21st
century literacies into my own practice? You may create this using anything you
like (e.g. powerpoint, prezi, blog, Glogster, twitter, Pinterest, Instagram,
Facebook, YouTube, a custom webpage, etc.) In your final product you MUST
answer the key question AND you MUST provide
evidence that you followed at least 3 interesting educators online throughout
the entire term and learned from their practice. You may include evidence
that you followed MORE than three interesting educators if you wish. You will
be peer assessing one of your peer’s rich performance assessment tasks in
addition to completing your own. Your rich performance assessment task is due by the beginning of class March 31th,
2015. More detail will be provided in class.
This RPAT is worth 20%
Rich Performance Assessment
Task Rubric
Criteria
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Level 4
|
Overall Understanding
|
Provides a limited answer
to the question: How will I incorporate the 21st century
Literacies into my own practice?
|
Provides some answer to
the question: How will I incorporate the 21st century Literacies
into my own practice?
|
Provides a comprehensive
answer to the question: How will I incorporate the 21st century
Literacies into my own practice?
|
Provides a thorough
answer to the question: How will I incorporate the 21st century
Literacies into my own practice?
|
Significant Issues
|
In a limited way
addresses significant issues related to the 21st Century Literacies.
Provides a limited answer to the “So what?” question (i.e. why do we care
about this)
|
Somewhat addresses
significant issues related to the 21st Century Literacies.
Somewhat answers the “So what?” question (i.e. why do we care about this)
|
Comprehensively addresses
significant issues related to the 21st Century Literacies.
Comprehensively answers the “So what?” question (i.e. why do we care about
this)
|
Thoroughly addresses
significant issues related to the 21st Century Literacies.
Thoroughly answers the “So what?” question (i.e. why do we care about this)
|
Depth/Critical Thinking
|
Provides a limited
analysis of the issues.
Questions are limited.
|
Provides some analysis of
the issues.
Questions some things –
Why is this so?
|
Provides a comprehensive analysis
of the issues.
Questions everything –
Why is this so?
|
Provides a thorough
analysis of the issues.
Questions everything –
Why is this so? - keeps questioning.
|
Clarity and Logic
|
Reflections/Analysis are
limited, organized in a limited fashion, and make limited conceptual sense
|
Reflections/Analysis are
somewhat clear, somewhat organized, and make some conceptual sense
|
Reflections/Analysis are
clear, well organized, and make conceptual sense
|
Reflections/Analysis are
very clear, extremely organized, and make a lot of conceptual sense
|
Personal Experience
|
Interweaves personal
experiences and reflections connected to course concepts into the final
product in a limited way
|
Somewhat interweaves
personal experiences and reflections connected to course concepts into the
final product
|
Comprehensively
interweaves personal experiences and reflections connected to course concepts
into the final product
|
Thoroughly interweaves
personal experiences and reflections connected to course concepts into the
final product
|
Other Educators
Experiences
|
Demonstrates they have
followed 21st Century educators throughout the term in a limited
way.
|
Somewhat demonstrates
they have followed 21st Century educators throughout the term.
|
Comprehensively
demonstrates they have followed 21st Century educators throughout
the term.
|
Thoroughly demonstrates
they have followed 21st Century educators throughout the term.
|
Horizontal scan and cluster
You will learn about the
horizontal scan and cluster next week. This is similar to the vertical scan and
cluster except that you look ACROSS the curriculum for what is similar.
Final thoughts
We are trying to engage you in a culture of
learning. We are not trying to make
things difficult for you. If your spirit is in the right place, we know. So if
things go wrong such as forgetting to hand in an exit card, just tell us. We are
only trying to keep good participation records so we can justify the
participation grade – but we are looking for patterns to do this – e.g.
continual buzzing/chatting during lecture, never handing in an exit card, always leaving early or arriving late, etc. We are on your side and want you to learn
something worthwhile. What you learn may not be directly on the Syllabus. Be open. Be patient with us too. We are all learners here.